Home > News
Your Questions: Can you compare older tests with more recent ones?
Vincent Alzieu
September 14, 2009 3:27 PM
September 14, 2009 3:27 PM
Here's an e-mail we received:
Hello,
Questions like this show why our Product Face-Offs are great. They put old products and new products right next to one another, monitors included. Sometimes, it's not so simple because our tests have evolved over time to become more accurate and more demanding as the quality of the products themselves has improved.
In your case, you can compare the Samsung 2394HM with the Belinea 101920:
Best wishes,
> Buyer's Guides: Our Pick of The Best Products
| Subject: How can you compare 'new' LCD screens with 'old' ones? Hello, Your tests are great, and I always come to your site before I buy anything high tech. There is one thing that I can't work out that's really useful to people thinking about making a purchase: how do you rate recent products compared to older ranges? Take me for example. I have a 19'' Belinea LCD, the 10 19 20, with an 8 ms response time. It's absolutely perfect for me, even for gaming as I don't play too often. I'm looking for a bigger screen, so I've been reading your tests. I came across the Samsung SyncMaster 2494HM, where you mention there's a small problem with responsiveness. I imagine that you were comparing this fault against the best monitors available at the moment? How does it compare to older models though? I would have thought it's still better, despite this responsiveness problem, but am I right? |
Hello,
Questions like this show why our Product Face-Offs are great. They put old products and new products right next to one another, monitors included. Sometimes, it's not so simple because our tests have evolved over time to become more accurate and more demanding as the quality of the products themselves has improved.
In your case, you can compare the Samsung 2394HM with the Belinea 101920:
- Responsiveness: the test card has changed, but you can still make use of it. On the right, the Belinea, clearly has much more remanance than the Samsung on the left. It's particularly obvious in the tests that show the 'best result', but it's also there in the test that shows the 'worst result'.
- The next thing to look at is the colour handling: some of the tests in between were too old for the Belinea 10 19 20. So off to the 'Colours with factory settings' tests it is, and again, Samsung clearly wins out.
- And you can carry on yourself … I'm sure you get the idea!
Best wishes,
> Buyer's Guides: Our Pick of The Best Products
Previous story / Next story
-
15/09Early 3D monitor from Zalman drops in price
-
14/09Recap: Last Week's Tests and Articles
-
14/09European Commission: misleading merchant sites
-
Current story -Your Questions: Can you compare older tests with more recent ones?
-
14/09Fujifilm F70EXR available for pre-order
-
14/09An early 3D TV from JVC: $9153
-
14/093D TVs: Panasonic take the first set
-
5/17/12Duel: HTC One X vs Sony Xperia S, Two Stars Of The Android Universe
-
5/1/12eBook Reader Review: Archos 70d eReader, A Hybrid Player
-
4/2/12New Kit for Sub-Pixel Spotting
-
3/16/12New iPad Retina Screen Test: Eye Watering!
-
2/27/12NEW! Compare Products in Table Format
-
2/21/12Samsung Spins Off LCD Business
-
2/17/12All-in-One PC Review: Asus ET2700INTS, 27'' With Intel Core i7
-
2/6/12Monitor Review: Philips P241P: 24'' Full HD with MVA Display
-
1/22/12Monitor Buyer's Guide Updated
-
1/4/12AMOLED Laptop Screens Coming in 2012?

News
Buyer's Guide: The Best Monitors
